Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparing characteristics based on the additional treatment needs after second-line treatments in the PDT group

From: Evaluating photodynamic therapy versus brolucizumab as a second-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Characteristic

Non-injection free cases,

N = 19

Injection-free cases,

N = 5

P-values

At the second-line treatment

Age (years)

73.0 ± 7.7; 73.0

81.4 ± 6.8; 82.0

0.042

Female

4 (21.1%)

0 (0.00%)

0.479

Total number of previous injections

12.1 ± 7.6; 11.0

11.2 ± 3.7; 11.0

0.943

BCVA (logMAR)

0.29 ± 0.35; 0.30

0.35 ± 0.29; 0.30

0.591

SRF

18 (94.7%)

5 (100%)

0.242

IRF

4 (21.1%)

3 (60.0%)

0.683

CVH

11 (57.9%)

5 (100%)

0.747

The maximum PED size (μm)

399.6 ± 291.7; 297.0

508.6 ± 238.5; 483.0

0.213

SRH

7 (36.8%)

1 (20.0%)

0.747

Fibrotic scar

6 (31.6%)

2 (40.0%)

0.747

CCT (μm)

244.7 ± 85.6; 233.0

243.2 ± 35.3; 236.0

0.915

CMT (μm)

396.8 ± 156.2; 353.0

360.0 ± 251.8; 246.0

0.095

The mean of previous treatment intervals (weeks)

6.3 ± 2.4; 5.7

6.7 ± 1.5; 6.7

0.595

Twelve months after a second-line treatment

BCVA (logMAR)

0.35 ± 0.42; 0.23

0.31 ± 0.29; 0.40

0.881

CMT (μm)

298.3 ± 67.2; 276.5

216.0 ± 23.3; 215.0

0.001

The change of BCVA from the baseline (logMAR)

0.06 ± 0.15; 0.00

− 0.05 ± 0.27; − 0.05

0.318

The change of CMT from the baseline (μm)

− 106.6 ± 168.3; -67.5

− 144.0 ± 243.5; -31.0

0.852

  1. The mean ± standard deviation; median was used for continuous variables, and numbers and percentages were used as nominal variables. P-values were calculated using logistic regression analysis using Firth’s bias reduction method for qualitative variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. PDT photodynamic therapy, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, SRF subretinal fluid; IRF, intraretinal fluid, CVH choroidal vascular hyperpermeability, PED pigment epithelial detachment, SRH subretinal hemorrhage, CCT central choroidal thickness, CMT central macular thickness